Integrative reviews are a form of evidence synthesis. The purpose of evidence synthesis is to use formal, explicit, rigorous research methods to bring together the findings of already completed studies (also known as "meta-research")1
Like all evidence syntheses, integrative reviews…
Unlike other types of evidence synthesis, integrative reviews:
1. Gough, D., Davies, P., Jamtvedt, G., Langlois, E., Littell, J., Lotfi, T., Masset, E., Merlin, T., Pullin, A. S., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., Røttingen, J.-A., Sena, E., Stewart, R., Tovey, D., White, H., Yost, J., Lund, H., & Grimshaw, J. (2020). Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position statement. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01415-5
2. Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019). Meeting the review family: Exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 36(3), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276
The process of conducting an integrative review can be generally organized into 6 major phases:
Summaries, tips and tools regarding the core activities and expected outcomes from each of these 6 phases can be found in the pages to the left.
The following published guidance has been used to shape the content of this research guide.
The IRMAT is an appraisal tool, meant to help readers of integrative reviews evaluate the rigor and reporting transparency in a published integrative review. If you are working on conducting an integrative review, it can be a helpful guide for ensuring that you are considering and documenting the elements necessary for a high quality integrative review.