Properly citing sources is an important piece of scholarly writing. For help formatting your citations in APA style, see the following resources:
While there is no universally used reporting standard for integrative reviews, it is common to see integrative reviews adhering to modified versions of PRISMA.
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based set of minimum items for reporting information in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Source:
Stotz, S. A., McNealy, K., Begay, R. L., DeSanto, K., Manson, S. M., & Moore, K. R. (2021). Multi-level diabetes prevention and treatment interventions for Native people in the USA and Canada: A scoping review. Current Diabetes Reports, 2(11), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-021-01414-3
This article, published in the Journal of the Medical Library Association, answers some frequently asked questions about using the PRISMA 2020 format.
Rethlefsen, M. L., & Page, M. J. (2022). PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 110(2), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449
As you write up your integrative review, it may be helpful to take a step back and critically appraise your own work in order to identify places where you may need to be more transparent in your reporting.
Consider the following resources to help you appraise the rigor and transparency in your own review.